Viacom Outdoor, Inc. v. Wixon Jewelers, Inc.
This text of 82 A.D.3d 604 (Viacom Outdoor, Inc. v. Wixon Jewelers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff’s failure to provide a working tri-vision billboard constituted a material breach of the parties’ contracts; thus, defendant was excused from performing its contractual payment obligations (NAS Elecs., Inc. v Transtech Elecs. PTE Ltd,., 262 F Supp 2d 134, 145 [SD NY 2003]). Plaintiffs unequivocal statement that it was going to convert the tri-vision billboard to a standard billboard, making clear that it did not intend to perform under the parties’ 2005 and 2006 contracts, constituted an anticipatory breach of those contracts (see Rachmani Corp. v 9 E. 96th St. Apt. Corp., 211 AD2d 262, 266-267 [1995]).
However, since defendant failed to present any evidence of damages resulting from the breach, it should not have been awarded any damages; indeed, the counterclaim should have been dismissed (Lexington 360 Assoc. v First Union Natl. Bank of N. Carolina, 234 AD2d 187, 190 [1996]; StoreRunner Network, Inc. v CBS Corp., 8 AD3d 127, 128 [2004]).
We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them without merit. Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Catterson, Richter, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
82 A.D.3d 604, 919 N.Y.2d 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/viacom-outdoor-inc-v-wixon-jewelers-inc-nyappdiv-2011.