Via v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Via v. State

567 So. 2d 543, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7499, 1990 WL 145581

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 3, 1990

DocketNo. 88-00646

StatusPublished

This text of 567 So. 2d 543 (Via v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Via v. State, 567 So. 2d 543, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7499, 1990 WL 145581 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant’s convictions and sentences for D.U.I. resulting in serious bodily injury.

We disagree with defendant’s contention that testimony about defendant’s intoxication was improperly admitted as an opinion of a lay witness. See City of Orlando v. Newell, 232 So.2d 413 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970).

We disagree with defendant’s contention that his probationary split sentence of two years imprisonment followed by three years probation was improper. See Poore v. State, 531 So.2d 161 (Fla.1988).

We find no merit in defendant’s remaining contention.

Affirmed.

LEHAN, A.C.J., and FRANK and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI