Via v. State Commission on Conservation & Development
296 U.S. 549, 56 S. Ct. 245
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 25, 1935
DocketNo. 58
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 296 U.S. 549 (Via v. State Commission on Conservation & Development) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Via v. State Commission on Conservation & Development, 296 U.S. 549, 56 S. Ct. 245 (1935).
Opinion
The decree is affirmed on the ground that appellant has an adequate remedy at law. Insurance Co. v. Bailey, 13 Wall. 616, 623; Grand Chute v. Winegar, 15 Wall. 373, 375, 376; Gaines v. Nicholson, 9 How. 356, 364—365; Wehrman v. Conkling, 155 U. S. 314, 326.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Tin Yan
355 P.2d 25 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1960)
Inland Steel Products Co. v. MPH Manufacturing Corp.
25 F.R.D. 238 (N.D. Illinois, 1959)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
296 U.S. 549, 56 S. Ct. 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/via-v-state-commission-on-conservation-development-scotus-1935.