V.G.M. v. City of Salinas

N.D. California

V.G.M. v. City of Salinas

DecidedFebruary 16, 2021

Docket5:19-cv-08007

StatusUnknown

This text of V.G.M. v. City of Salinas (V.G.M. v. City of Salinas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

V.G.M. v. City of Salinas, (N.D. Cal. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq. 1 State Bar #69888 2 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS 3 Airport Corporate Centre 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 4 Oakland, California 94621 5 Telephone: (510) 839-5200 Facsimile: (510) 839-3882 6 Email: john.burris@johnburrislaw.com

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11

12 13 V.G.M., et al., Case No. 19-cv-08007-BLF

14 Plaintiffs, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 15 v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 16 CITY OF SALINAS, et al., REGARDING RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Defendants. 17

18 As set forth in Respondent’s Motion to File Under Seal, Respondent lodged with the 19 Court the following documents containing information designated "Confidential”: 20 Exhibit A: A copy of the Retainer Agreement, pertaining to the instant matter; 21 Exhibit B: Copies of the Retainer Agreements, pertaining to the instant matter; 22 Exhibit C: Email from Melissa Nold dated August 3, 2020, pertaining to the instant matter. 23 Having considered Respondent’s Administrative Motion, pursuant to Civil Local 24 Rule 79-5(d) in support of sealing, the Court finds that the good cause standard of Rule 26(c) 25 applies since the records are not related to the merits of the case. Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler 26 Grp., 809 F.3d 1092, 1099 (9th Cir. 2016). Good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY 27 ORDERED that the above referenced documents be filed under seal. 1 2 || Dated: February 16, 2021 kom Lh ham én) 3 BETH LABSON FREEMAN 4 United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 a 12

Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq. 1 State Bar #69888 2 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS 3 Airport Corporate Centre 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 4 Oakland, California 94621 5 Telephone: (510) 839-5200 Facsimile: (510) 839-3882 6 Email: john.burris@johnburrislaw.com

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11

12 13 V.G.M., et al., Case No. 19-cv-08007-BLF

14 Plaintiffs, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 15 v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 16 CITY OF SALINAS, et al., REGARDING RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Defendants. 17

18 As set forth in Respondent’s Motion to File Under Seal, Respondent lodged with the 19 Court the following documents containing information designated "Confidential”: 20 Exhibit A: A copy of the Retainer Agreement, pertaining to the instant matter; 21 Exhibit B: Copies of the Retainer Agreements, pertaining to the instant matter; 22 Exhibit C: Email from Melissa Nold dated August 3, 2020, pertaining to the instant matter. 23 Having considered Respondent’s Administrative Motion, pursuant to Civil Local 24 Rule 79-5(d) in support of sealing, the Court finds that the good cause standard of Rule 26(c) 25 applies since the records are not related to the merits of the case. Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler 26 Grp., 809 F.3d 1092, 1099 (9th Cir. 2016). Good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY 27 ORDERED that the above referenced documents be filed under seal. 1 2 || Dated: February 16, 2021 kom Lh ham én) 3 BETH LABSON FREEMAN 4 United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 a 12

Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

V.G.M. v. City of Salinas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vgm-v-city-of-salinas-cand-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack