V.F. v. State

93 So. 3d 526, 2012 WL 3101677, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12527
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 1, 2012·No. No. 4D11-4363·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

V.F., a juvenile, appeals the trial court’s imposition of a mandatory fifteen days in a secure detention facility pursuant to section 790.22(9), Florida Statutes (2011). In B. O. v. State, 25 So.3d 586 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009), we held that it was error to impose the section 790.22(9) sentencing enhancement based on a guilty plea to grand theft of a firearm where the juvenile petition neither cited the statute nor alleged that, in committing the theft, the child used or possessed a firearm. As in B.O., the trial court here imposed a fifteen-day mandatory period of detention based on appellant’s plea of no contest to grand theft of a firearm. The grand theft charge in the juvenile petition here, however, suffered the same deficiency as in B. O. As such, we reverse the imposition of the mandatory fifteen-day minimum detention.

Reversed.

STEVENSON, CIKLIN, JJ., and WALSH, LISA S., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

V.F. v. State, 93 So. 3d 526, 2012 WL 3101677, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12527 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

93 So. 3d 526 (V.F. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

B.O. v. State
25 So. 3d 586 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)