Vezza v. Spring Rock Golf Center, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vezza v. Spring Rock Golf Center, Inc.

36 A.D.3d 689, 826 N.Y.S.2d 577

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 16, 2007·Published

Opinion

[690]*690In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mahon, J.), dated June 24, 2005, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The infant plaintiff was injured when she stepped onto a fairway of a miniature golf course to look for a missing ball. The defendant established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Capozzi v Huhne, 14 AD3d 474 [2005]; Jang Hee Lee v Sung Whun Oh, 3 AD3d 473, 474 [2004]; Cupo v Karfunkel, 1 AD3d 48, 52 [2003]; Dawson v Cafiero, 292 AD2d 488 [2002]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the fairway was negligently designed (see Barboto v Hollow Hills Country Club, 14 AD3d 522, 523 [2005]; Veccia v Clearmeadow Pistol Club, 300 AD2d 472 [2002]). Crane, J.E, Spolzino, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[690]*690In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mahon, J.), dated June 24, 2005, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The infant plaintiff was injured when she stepped onto a fairway of a miniature golf course to look for a missing ball. The defendant established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Capozzi v Huhne, 14 AD3d 474 [2005]; Jang Hee Lee v Sung Whun Oh, 3 AD3d 473, 474 [2004]; Cupo v Karfunkel, 1 AD3d 48, 52 [2003]; Dawson v Cafiero, 292 AD2d 488 [2002]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the fairway was negligently designed (see Barboto v Hollow Hills Country Club, 14 AD3d 522, 523 [2005]; Veccia v Clearmeadow Pistol Club, 300 AD2d 472 [2002]). Crane, J.E, Spolzino, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Vezza v. Spring Rock Golf Center, Inc., 36 A.D.3d 689, 826 N.Y.S.2d 577 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

36 A.D.3d 689 (Vezza v. Spring Rock Golf Center, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related