Vezza v. City of Yonkers

92 A.D.2d 570, 459 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16807
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 14, 1983·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Beisheim, J.), entered January 20, 1982, which granted the application. Order reversed, as a matter of discretion, with $50 costs and disburse[571] ments, and application denied. In light of the unexcused over two-year delay in seeking to serve a late notice of claim, the fact that the injured person’s infancy was clearly unrelated to the delay, the justified failure of appellants to investigate the facts underlying the claim, and the failure to provide an affidavit by one having knowledge of the facts, it was an abuse of discretion to allow petitioners to serve a late notice of claim (see Matter ofPersi v Church-ville-Chili Cent. School Dist., 72 AD2d 946, affd 52 NY2d 988). Damiani, J. P., Gibbons, Thompson and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vezza v. City of Yonkers, 92 A.D.2d 570, 459 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16807 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

92 A.D.2d 570 (Vezza v. City of Yonkers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Katz v. Rockville Centre Union Free School District
131 A.D.2d 574 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Hogan v. Town of Orangetown
108 A.D.2d 857 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Tetro v. Plainview-Old Bethpage Central School District
99 A.D.2d 814 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)