Vetters v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Vetters v. State

1931 OK CR 287, 300 P. 426, 51 Okla. Crim. 186, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 270

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 12, 1931

DocketNo. A-8088.

StatusPublished

This text of 1931 OK CR 287 (Vetters v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vetters v. State, 1931 OK CR 287, 300 P. 426, 51 Okla. Crim. 186, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 270 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVENPORT, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was convicted in the superior court of Okmulgee county on a charge of possession of home-brew, with intent to sell or otherwise dispose of the same contrary to the statutes in such cases made and provided, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and be confined in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

The appeal in this case was filed on February 20,1931; no brief has been filed; and no further appearance made. Where no brief is filed and no appearance made, the court will consider the appeal is without merit or has been abandoned. An examination of the record shows there are no fundamental or prejudicial errors.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

CHAPPELL and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVENPORT, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was convicted in the superior court of Okmulgee county on a charge of possession of home-brew, with intent to sell or otherwise dispose of the same contrary to the statutes in such cases made and provided, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and be confined in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

The appeal in this case was filed on February 20,1931; no brief has been filed; and no further appearance made. Where no brief is filed and no appearance made, the court will consider the appeal is without merit or has been abandoned. An examination of the record shows there are no fundamental or prejudicial errors.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

CHAPPELL and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1931 OK CR 287, 300 P. 426, 51 Okla. Crim. 186, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vetters-v-state-oklacrimapp-1931.