Veterans Loan Authority v. Danzo
This text of 210 So. 2d 461 (Veterans Loan Authority v. Danzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant, Veterans Loan Authority, a body politic and corporate of the State of New Jersey, has brought this appeal from a final judgment of the circuit court in favor of appellee, Margaret Mary Gro-gan.
The appellant has not brought us a record of the testimony and evidence before the trial judge; we therefore affirm the judgment upon the authority of Short v. Short, Fla.App.1964, 162 So.2d 538, and McEachin v. McEachin, Fla.App.1963, 154 So.2d 894, 898.
We have considered appellant’s point directed to the court’s discretion in setting aside a default judgment against the appellee and hold that no error has been demonstrated. See Florida Investment Enterprises, Inc. v. Kentucky Co., Fla.App.1964, 160 So.2d 733.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
210 So. 2d 461, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veterans-loan-authority-v-danzo-fladistctapp-1968.