Veterans for Common Sense v. Eric K. Shinseki

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Veterans for Common Sense v. Eric K. Shinseki. Read the opinion of the Court — 644 F.3d 845
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 16, 2011·No. 08-16728·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VETERANS FOR COMMON SENSE, a  District of Columbia nonprofit organization; VETERANS UNITED FOR TRUTH, INC., a California nonprofit organization, representing their members and a class of all veterans similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs; UNITED STATES No. 08-16728 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS; JAMES P. TERRY, Chairman, Board  D.C. No.

3:07-cv-03758-SC

of Veterans’ Appeals; MICHAEL WALCOFF, Acting Under Secretary, ORDER Veterans Benefits Administration; BRADLEY G. MAYES, Director, Compensation and Pension Service; ROBERT A. PETZEL, M.D., Under Secretary, Veterans Health Administration; PRITZ K. NAVARA, Veterans Service Center Manager, Oakland Regional Office, Department of Veterans Affairs; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants-Appellees.

Filed November 16, 2011

20367

20368 VETERANS FOR COMMON SENSE v. SHINSEKI ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge W. Fletcher did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Veterans for Common Sense v. Eric K. Shinseki, (9th Cir. 2011).

Veterans for Common Sense v. Eric K. Shinseki (Veterans for Common Sense v. Eric K. Shinseki) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.