Veterans Auto Sales & Leasing Co. v. Poole

683 So. 2d 567, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11372, 1996 WL 629800
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 1, 1996·No. No. 93-1839·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is before us after we relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court for the purpose of stating grounds for its grant of a new trial. It was necessary to consider those grounds in accordance with the supreme court’s opinion in Poole v. Veterans Auto Sales and Leasing, Co., Inc., 668 So.2d 189 (Fla.1996).

The trial court’s order stating its grounds for granting a new trial has been reviewed by us and we find no abuse of discretion in its action. ‘We are unable to say, after viewing the evidence as a whole, that reasonable ... [persons] could not have concluded that the verdict ... was against the manifest weight of the evidence.” Smith v. Brown, 525 So.2d 868, 870 (Fla.1988).

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

PETERSON, C.J., and ANTOON, J., concur. HARRIS, J., concurs and concurs specially, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Veterans Auto Sales & Leasing Co. v. Poole, 683 So. 2d 567, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11372, 1996 WL 629800 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

683 So. 2d 567 (Veterans Auto Sales & Leasing Co. v. Poole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clough v. Christopher
711 So. 2d 610 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)