Vester J. Thompson, Jr., Inc. v. Citmoco Services, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Vester J. Thompson, Jr., Inc. v. Citmoco Services, Inc.

371 So. 2d 46, 1979 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 860

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Vester J. Thompson, Jr., Inc. v. Citmoco Services, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 1978 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 967 →

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided March 7, 1979·No. Civ. 989·Published

Opinion

[47] On Remand from Supreme Court

BRADLEY, Judge.

Upon remand to this court by the Supreme Court of Alabama and at the direction of that court, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and one is here rendered in favor of plaintiff, Vester J. Thompson, Jr., Inc., and against Citmoco Services, Inc. for $6,510.25 plus interest.

Plaintiff, Vester J. Thompson, Jr., Inc., has filed a motion here asking this court to correct or delete a sentence from the opinion of the supreme court, restate certain findings of fact contained in this court’s original opinion, and to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $8,937.90.

In view of the specific mandate of the supreme court to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant for $6,510.25 plus interest, this court has no alternative but to obey the directive of the supreme court.

MOTION DENIED.

REVERSED AND RENDERED.

WRIGHT, P. J., and HOLMES, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[47] On Remand from Supreme Court

BRADLEY, Judge.

Upon remand to this court by the Supreme Court of Alabama and at the direction of that court, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and one is here rendered in favor of plaintiff, Vester J. Thompson, Jr., Inc., and against Citmoco Services, Inc. for $6,510.25 plus interest.

Plaintiff, Vester J. Thompson, Jr., Inc., has filed a motion here asking this court to correct or delete a sentence from the opinion of the supreme court, restate certain findings of fact contained in this court’s original opinion, and to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $8,937.90.

In view of the specific mandate of the supreme court to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant for $6,510.25 plus interest, this court has no alternative but to obey the directive of the supreme court.

MOTION DENIED.

REVERSED AND RENDERED.

WRIGHT, P. J., and HOLMES, J., concur.

Vester J. Thompson, Jr., Inc. v. Citmoco Services, Inc., 371 So. 2d 46, 1979 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 860 (Ala. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

371 So. 2d 46 (Vester J. Thompson, Jr., Inc. v. Citmoco Services, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.