Vestal v. Clinton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6089

DANNY ALAN VESTAL, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus BILL CLINTON; JAMES B. HUNT, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-752)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 21, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Danny Alan Vestal, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re-

lief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Vestal v. Clinton, No. CA-95-752 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 9, 1996). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED