Vest v. Wilson

136 So. 730, 223 Ala. 414, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 431
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 27, 1931·No. 8 Div. 277.·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

BOULDIN, J.

In a bill for sale of lands for division, the averment: “The complainant owns a one-third undivided interest for life and the defendant is the owner of a two-thirds undivided interest in fee simple and owns the remainder of complainant’s one-third undivided interest for life,” sufficiently sets forth the interests of the parties, and that all the joint owners are before the court.

How their respective interests were acquired, and muniments of title, are matters of evidence. Henderson v. Stinson, 207 Ala. 365, 92 So. 453; Curlee v. Scott, 207 Ala. 478, 93 So. 393; Foley v. Brock, 173 Ala. 336, 56 So. 207.

The description of the property is sufficient. It clearly identifies each of the two parcels of land.

The demurrer was properly overruled.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vest v. Wilson, 136 So. 730, 223 Ala. 414, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 431 (Ala. 1931).

136 So. 730 (Vest v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atkins v. Wallace
137 So. 2d 750 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1962)
Coppett v. Monahan
103 So. 2d 169 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1958)
Bowden v. Teague
93 So. 2d 408 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1957)
Hardee v. Hardee
93 So. 2d 127 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1956)
Brewer v. Brewer
34 So. 2d 13 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1948)