Vest v. Vest

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Vest v. Vest

181 So. 3d 1058, 2015 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 106, 2015 WL 2165949

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedMay 8, 2015

Docket2120913

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 181 So. 3d 1058 (Vest v. Vest) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vest v. Vest, 181 So. 3d 1058, 2015 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 106, 2015 WL 2165949 (Ala. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

On April 25, 2014, this court affirmed a judgment entered by the Elmore Circuit Court (“the trial court”) in favor of Jennifer Ann Vest (Herron). Vest v. Vest (No. 2120913, April 25, 2014), 181 So.3d 1058 (Ala.Civ.App.2014) (table). Our affirmance has been reversed, and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. See Ex parte Vest, 181 So.3d 1049 (Ala.2015). [1059]*1059On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, we hereby reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause to that court for it “to decide whether to dismiss or to transfer [David Jeremy Vest’s] motion to modify custody filed in that court on June 25, 2010.” 181 So.3d at 1057.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

THOMPSON, P.J., and THOMAS, MOORE, and DONALDSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

On April 25, 2014, this court affirmed a judgment entered by the Elmore Circuit Court (“the trial court”) in favor of Jennifer Ann Vest (Herron). Vest v. Vest (No. 2120913, April 25, 2014), 181 So.3d 1058 (Ala.Civ.App.2014) (table). Our affirmance has been reversed, and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. See Ex parte Vest, 181 So.3d 1049 (Ala.2015). [1059]*1059On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, we hereby reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause to that court for it “to decide whether to dismiss or to transfer [David Jeremy Vest’s] motion to modify custody filed in that court on June 25, 2010.” 181 So.3d at 1057.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

THOMPSON, P.J., and THOMAS, MOORE, and DONALDSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 So. 3d 1058, 2015 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 106, 2015 WL 2165949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vest-v-vest-alacivapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack