Vesell v. Schreiber

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Vesell v. Schreiber

104 N.Y.S. 915

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 6, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 104 N.Y.S. 915 (Vesell v. Schreiber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vesell v. Schreiber, 104 N.Y.S. 915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant having appeared upon the return day, the jurisdiction of the court was complete, and the denial of the motion to open the default upon the ground specified in the order, “that the court was without jurisdiction,” was error. Bevins & Rogers, App. Term Pr. c. 10, § 111; Elfenbein v. Rosenthal, 47 Misc. Rep. 380, 94 N. Y. Supp. 40; Droege v. Hertz et al. (Sup.) 95 N. Y. Supp. 570; Wolfert v. N. Y. City Ry. Co. (Sup.) 103 N. Y. Supp. 768.

Order reversed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant having appeared upon the return day, the jurisdiction of the court was complete, and the denial of the motion to open the default upon the ground specified in the order, “that the court was without jurisdiction,” was error. Bevins & Rogers, App. Term Pr. c. 10, § 111; Elfenbein v. Rosenthal, 47 Misc. Rep. 380, 94 N. Y. Supp. 40; Droege v. Hertz et al. (Sup.) 95 N. Y. Supp. 570; Wolfert v. N. Y. City Ry. Co. (Sup.) 103 N. Y. Supp. 768.

Order reversed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 N.Y.S. 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vesell-v-schreiber-nyappterm-1907.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack