Vescio v. Silverman

20 Misc. 2d 876, 194 N.Y.S.2d 967, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2465
New York Supreme Court·Decided December 8, 1959·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Milton Wecht, J.

This is a motion by plaintiff for summary • judgment. The action arises out of an accident which occurred on November 11, 1958. The plaintiff was crossing 101st Avenue near Waltham Street, from north to south, when he was struck by defendant’s motor vehicle traveling the wrong way on a one-way street, which defendant admits.

Upon the undisputed facts submitted, the defendant was clearly negligent, and the plaintiff was in no way contributorily [877]*877negligent. A pedestrian is under no duty to look for motor vehicles traveling in the wrong direction on a one-way street (see Bradley v. Jaeckel, 65 Misc. 509) and his failure to do so does not constitute contributory negligence (Marx v. United States, 132 F. Supp. 626).

Accordingly, the motion is granted and the matter set for assessment of damages by a jury or by the court if the jury be waived, and upon payment of all appropriate calendar fees.

Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vescio v. Silverman, 20 Misc. 2d 876, 194 N.Y.S.2d 967, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2465 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1959).

20 Misc. 2d 876 (Vescio v. Silverman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bennett v. Cruz
168 A.D.2d 307 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Wright v. City of Louisville
477 S.W.2d 146 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1971)
Meredith v. Crumpton
434 S.W.2d 648 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1968)
Mayer v. Piser
34 Misc. 2d 162 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)