Verzone v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Verzone v. State

868 So. 2d 406, 2003 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 155, 2003 WL 21480410

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedJune 27, 2003

DocketCR-01-0698

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 868 So. 2d 406 (Verzone v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Verzone v. State, 868 So. 2d 406, 2003 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 155, 2003 WL 21480410 (Ala. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

BASCHAB, Judge.

In accordance with the Alabama Supreme Court’s opinion in Ex parte Verzone, 868 So.2d 399 (Ala.2003), we reverse the appellant’s conviction and remand this case to the trial court for proceedings that are consistent with that opinion. We note that, based on Ex parte Wood, 564 So.2d 860 (Ala.1990), and State v. Saxton, 724 So.2d 77 (Ala.Crim.App.1998), it appears that the State may, if it so chooses, rein-dict the appellant for the first-degree robbery of Juliann Bradford.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

McMILLAN, PH., and COBB, SHAW, and WISE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI