Verzone v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Verzone v. State

868 So. 2d 406, 2003 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 155, 2003 WL 21480410

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided June 27, 2003·No. CR-01-0698·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

BASCHAB, Judge.

In accordance with the Alabama Supreme Court’s opinion in Ex parte Verzone, 868 So.2d 399 (Ala.2003), we reverse the appellant’s conviction and remand this case to the trial court for proceedings that are consistent with that opinion. We note that, based on Ex parte Wood, 564 So.2d 860 (Ala.1990), and State v. Saxton, 724 So.2d 77 (Ala.Crim.App.1998), it appears that the State may, if it so chooses, rein-dict the appellant for the first-degree robbery of Juliann Bradford.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

McMILLAN, PH., and COBB, SHAW, and WISE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

BASCHAB, Judge.

In accordance with the Alabama Supreme Court’s opinion in Ex parte Verzone, 868 So.2d 399 (Ala.2003), we reverse the appellant’s conviction and remand this case to the trial court for proceedings that are consistent with that opinion. We note that, based on Ex parte Wood, 564 So.2d 860 (Ala.1990), and State v. Saxton, 724 So.2d 77 (Ala.Crim.App.1998), it appears that the State may, if it so chooses, rein-dict the appellant for the first-degree robbery of Juliann Bradford.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

McMILLAN, PH., and COBB, SHAW, and WISE, JJ., concur.

Verzone v. State, 868 So. 2d 406, 2003 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 155, 2003 WL 21480410 (Ala. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

868 So. 2d 406 (Verzone v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related