Ververis v. Hartfield Lanes
This text of 723 N.W.2d 904 (Ververis v. Hartfield Lanes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Peter VERVERIS and Theresa Ververis, as Next Friend of Philip Ververis, a Minor, Plaintiffs-Appellants and CrossAppellees,
v.
HARTFIELD LANES, Defendant-Appellee and CrossAppellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 2, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
723 N.W.2d 904, 477 Mich. 952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ververis-v-hartfield-lanes-mich-2006.