Vertiv Inc. v. Wayne Burt PTE Ltd

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Vertiv Inc. v. Wayne Burt PTE Ltd. Read the opinion of the Court — 92 F.4th 169
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided February 5, 2024·No. 22-3305·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________

No. 22-3305 _____________

VERTIV, INC.; VERTIV CAPITAL, INC.; and GNARITIS, INC., Appellants

v.

WAYNE BURT PTE, LTD., and TGS MAHESH _____________

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. Civil No. 3:20-cv-00363) District Judge: Honorable Georgette Castner _____________

Before: CHAGARES, Chief Judge, HARDIMAN and FREEMAN, Circuit Judges. _______________

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

It is hereby ordered that the Opinion filed on February 1, 2024, is amended as follows:

On Page 22, in the last sentence (which continues onto Page 23), the words “Wayne Burt” shall be changed to “Vertiv” such that the sentence will read: “Vertiv has presented no evidence to counter the District Court’s finding about equal distribution of assets.”

By the Court,

s/ Arianna J. Freeman Circuit Judge

Dated: February 5, 2024 Tmm/cc: Robert T. Szyba, Esq. Patrick T. Collins, Esq

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vertiv Inc. v. Wayne Burt PTE Ltd, (3d Cir. 2024).

Vertiv Inc. v. Wayne Burt PTE Ltd (Vertiv Inc. v. Wayne Burt PTE Ltd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.