Vertiv Inc. v. Wayne Burt PTE Ltd
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________
No. 22-3305 _____________
VERTIV, INC.; VERTIV CAPITAL, INC.; and GNARITIS, INC., Appellants
v.
WAYNE BURT PTE, LTD., and TGS MAHESH _____________
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. Civil No. 3:20-cv-00363) District Judge: Honorable Georgette Castner _____________
Before: CHAGARES, Chief Judge, HARDIMAN and FREEMAN, Circuit Judges. _______________
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
It is hereby ordered that the Opinion filed on February 1, 2024, is amended as follows:
On Page 22, in the last sentence (which continues onto Page 23), the words “Wayne Burt” shall be changed to “Vertiv” such that the sentence will read: “Vertiv has presented no evidence to counter the District Court’s finding about equal distribution of assets.”
By the Court,
s/ Arianna J. Freeman Circuit Judge
Dated: February 5, 2024 Tmm/cc: Robert T. Szyba, Esq. Patrick T. Collins, Esq
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vertiv Inc. v. Wayne Burt PTE Ltd (Vertiv Inc. v. Wayne Burt PTE Ltd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.