Vertimer v. Reichard

Cal. District Court

Vertimer v. Reichard

1 Cal. Dist. Ct. 214

DecidedSeptember 15, 1857

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cal. Dist. Ct. 214 (Vertimer v. Reichard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California District Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vertimer v. Reichard, 1 Cal. Dist. Ct. 214 (Cal. Super. Ct. 1857).

Pincite

Opinion

Botts, J.

This is an action brought upon an open account for goods, wares, and merchandise. The defendant pleads that no part of the cause of action occurred within one year from the commencement of the suit.

The complaint alleges that the last item la the aseoumt h@c$o <S®t® January 18,1856, and It is admitted that the complaint was ffled Jm= uary 19,1857.

The statute Is imperative in requiring such a® action to be commenced within a year. In reckoning time from am event, here It is reckoned from the delivery of the last item, the day of fee event Is to-be computed. The People vs. Clark, 1 Cal. Rep., 407. As to the fact urged by fee plaintiff's counsel, that the 18th of January, 1857, fell on Sunday, the authority cited (note to 2d Hill, 377) is directly against him.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Botts, J.

This is an action brought upon an open account for goods, wares, and merchandise. The defendant pleads that no part of the cause of action occurred within one year from the commencement of the suit.

The complaint alleges that the last item la the aseoumt h@c$o <S®t® January 18,1856, and It is admitted that the complaint was ffled Jm= uary 19,1857.

The statute Is imperative in requiring such a® action to be commenced within a year. In reckoning time from am event, here It is reckoned from the delivery of the last item, the day of fee event Is to-be computed. The People vs. Clark, 1 Cal. Rep., 407. As to the fact urged by fee plaintiff's counsel, that the 18th of January, 1857, fell on Sunday, the authority cited (note to 2d Hill, 377) is directly against him.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cal. Dist. Ct. 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vertimer-v-reichard-caldistct-1857.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack