Vertical Tank, Inc. v. BakerCorp

Opinion

1 EASTMAN MCCARTNEY DALLMANN LLP JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL Mathew C. McCartney (SBN 226687) LLP 21! N. Thomas McCartney (SBN 066758) STANLEY M. GIBSON (Bar No. 162329) 3 4709 Kimber Avenue ROD S. BERMAN (Bar No. 105444) Bakersfield, California 93307 GREGORY S. CORDREY (Bar No. 190144) 4 Telephone: (661) 334-1800 JESSICA P. G. NEWMAN (Bar No. 309170) Facsimile: (661) 334-8016 1900 Avenue of the Stars, Seventh Floor 5 Email: matt@emdllp.com Los Angeles, California 90067 Email: tom@emdllp.com Telephone: (310) 203-8080 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Vertical Tank, Inc. Facsimile: (310) 203-0567 4 Email: rberman@jmbm.com; Email: sgibson@jmbm.com; 8 Email: jnewman@jmbm.com Attorneys for Defendants BakerCorp and United 10 Rentals (North America), Inc. . ll UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT oe 614 > 15 VERTICAL TANK INC., a California Case No. 1:18-CV-00145-LJO-JLT corporation, 16 STIPULATED DISMISSAL PURSUANT > Plaintiff, TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1) AND [PROPOSED] 7 ORDER CLOSING THE CASE Vv. (Doc. 62) 18 BAKERCORP, a Delaware Corporation; and INC., a Delaware corporation; 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

1 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Plaintiff Vertical Tank Ink. (“VTI’), and Defendants and 2 Counterclaimants BakerCorp and United Rentals (North America), Inc. (“Defendants”), by and 3 through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff's claims and Defendants’ 4 counterclaims in the above-entitled matter are dismissed WITH PREJUDICE and subject to the 5 terms of the Settlement Agreement entered into by and between VTI and Defendants, with each 6 party to bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees. 7 Respectfully Submitted, 9 DATED: December 4, 2019 EASTMAN MCCARTNEY DALLMANN LLP MATHEW C. MCCARTNEY . 11 12 By: /s/ N. Thomas McCartney Ss 13 N. THOMAS MCCARTNEY 55 Attorneys for Plaintiff aa VERTICAL TANK, INC. => 15 16 DATED: December 4, 2019 JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP > STANLEY M. GIBSON GREGORY S. CORDREY 19 20 . By: /s/ Stanley M. Gibson 21 STANLEY M. GIBSON Attorneys for Defendants 22 BAKERCORP and UNITED RENTALS 53 (NORTH AMERICA), INC.

24 25 26 27 28

2 The parties have settled their case and have stipulated to the action being dismissed with 3 prejudice. (Doc. 62) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations 4 effective immediately with further order of the Court. Because all parties who have appeared in 5 the action signed the stipulation, it “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San 6 Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close 7 this action. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: _ December 4, 2019 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 11 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Po is 14 > 15 16

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28