Home/New York Court of Appeals/Verstandig v. Schlaffer

Verstandig v. Schlaffer

70 N.E.2d 15, 296 N.Y. 62
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 14, 1946
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 70 N.E.2d 15 (Verstandig v. Schlaffer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Verstandig v. Schlaffer, 70 N.E.2d 15, 296 N.Y. 62 (N.Y. 1946).

Opinion

Per, Curiam.

The contracts of a person of unsound mind, who has not been'judicially declared incompetent, are voidable at his election upon recovering his reason or at the- election of his committee or ¿personal representatives or heirs. (Finch v. Goldstein, 245 N. Y. 300; Smith v. Ryan, 191 N. Y. 452; Blinn v. Schwarz, 177 N. Y. 252; McCarthy v. Bowling Green Storage & Van Co., 182 App. Div. 18.) The power of avoiding such a contract may be exercised, at least against the other party thereto, even in the case of an executed contract which is fair and for the benefit of the incompetent and which has been made in good faith.and without notice of the incompetency, provided only that the party so executing it can be and is placed in statu quo. (Smith v. Byan, supra; Riggs v. American Tract Society, 84 N. Y. 330; Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Hunt, 79 N. Y. 541; McCarthy v. Bowling Green Storage & Van Co., supra.) Since defendants herein have offered to replace plaintiff in her original position, their counterclaim for rescission should not *65 have been dismissed in the absence of a finding that the status quo cannot be restored.

The reference in Goldberg v. McCord (251 N. Y. 28, 32) to “ bona fide purchasers for value without notice of the incompetency ” relates to remote grantees and cannot be applied to the immediate parties to the contract.

The judgments should be reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.

Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher, Dye and Fuld, JJ., concur.

Judgments reversed, etc. [See 296 N. Y. 997.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kirshtein v. Americu Credit Union
65 A.D.3d 147 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
United States v. Manny
645 F.2d 163 (Second Circuit, 1981)
United States v. James C. Manny, and the Bank of New York as Co-Executors of the Estate of Walter Roy Manny, Deceased, United States of America v. Robert C. Stanley, Jr., Colton P. Wagner, and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., as Executors of the Estate of James G. Timolat, Jr.
645 F.2d 163 (Second Circuit, 1981)
United States v. Manny
463 F. Supp. 444 (S.D. New York, 1978)
Bankers Trust Co. v. Martin
51 A.D.2d 411 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Ortelere v. Teachers' Retirement Board
250 N.E.2d 460 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
Moore v. New York Life Insurance Company
146 S.E.2d 492 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)
In re the Estate of Frisch
49 Misc. 2d 898 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1965)
Dudyak v. Dudyak
21 A.D.2d 53 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
Faber v. Sweet Style Manufacturing Corp.
40 Misc. 2d 212 (New York Supreme Court, 1963)
Crawford v. Town of Hamburg
19 A.D.2d 100 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)
Warner v. State of New York
79 N.E.2d 459 (New York Court of Appeals, 1948)
Verstandig v. Schlaffer
73 N.E.2d 573 (New York Court of Appeals, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 N.E.2d 15, 296 N.Y. 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/verstandig-v-schlaffer-ny-1946.