Verstandig v. Diamond Dealers Club, Inc.
This text of 23 A.D.2d 547 (Verstandig v. Diamond Dealers Club, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment denominated order denying a petition brought under CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, with $50 costs to respondent-respondent. The record suffices to warrant the club’s action in suspending petitioner as a member for breach of the Debtor-Creditor General Rules of the club. Under the circumstances, therefore, it is not necessary to reach the question whether the arbitration clause contained in the by-laws of the club applies to parties to a dispute where none demands arbitration and they resort to the courts for resolution of such dispute. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Steuer and Witmer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 A.D.2d 547, 256 N.Y.S.2d 318, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/verstandig-v-diamond-dealers-club-inc-nyappdiv-1965.