Verspyck v. Franco

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Verspyck v. Franco

847 A.2d 314, 268 Conn. 919, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 157

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedMarch 30, 2004

DocketSC 17160

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 847 A.2d 314 (Verspyck v. Franco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Verspyck v. Franco, 847 A.2d 314, 268 Conn. 919, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 157 (Colo. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 81 Conn. App. 646 (AC 23813), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“In this action for vexatious litigation, did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of the trial court on the ground that the trial court improperly had rejected the defendant Marilyn P. Altsheler’s special defense of reliance on the advice of counsel?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 81 Conn. App. 646 (AC 23813), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“In this action for vexatious litigation, did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of the trial court on the ground that the trial court improperly had rejected the defendant Marilyn P. Altsheler’s special defense of reliance on the advice of counsel?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

847 A.2d 314, 268 Conn. 919, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/verspyck-v-franco-conn-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack