Versendaal v. Rose

Supreme Court of Iowa

Versendaal v. Rose

214 N.W.2d 914, 1974 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1358

CourtSupreme Court of Iowa

DecidedFebruary 20, 1974

DocketNo. 2-55999

StatusPublished

This text of 214 N.W.2d 914 (Versendaal v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Versendaal v. Rose, 214 N.W.2d 914, 1974 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1358 (iowa 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff takes permissive interlocutory appeal from district court order setting aside default and attendant judgment against defendant.

In light of our apt holdings in Hannan v. Bowles Watch Band Company, 180 N.W.2d 221 (Iowa 1970), Hobbs v. Martin Marietta Co., 257 Iowa 124, 131 N.W.2d 772 (1964), and Edgar v. Armored Carrier Corporation, 256 Iowa 700, 128 N.W.2d 922 (1964), trial court’s adjudication is correct.

Affirmed, see rule 348.1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff takes permissive interlocutory appeal from district court order setting aside default and attendant judgment against defendant.

In light of our apt holdings in Hannan v. Bowles Watch Band Company, 180 N.W.2d 221 (Iowa 1970), Hobbs v. Martin Marietta Co., 257 Iowa 124, 131 N.W.2d 772 (1964), and Edgar v. Armored Carrier Corporation, 256 Iowa 700, 128 N.W.2d 922 (1964), trial court’s adjudication is correct.

Affirmed, see rule 348.1.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 N.W.2d 914, 1974 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/versendaal-v-rose-iowa-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack