Versendaal v. Rose
214 N.W.2d 914, 1974 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1358
Opinion
Plaintiff takes permissive interlocutory appeal from district court order setting aside default and attendant judgment against defendant.
In light of our apt holdings in Hannan v. Bowles Watch Band Company, 180 N.W.2d 221 (Iowa 1970), Hobbs v. Martin Marietta Co., 257 Iowa 124, 131 N.W.2d 772 (1964), and Edgar v. Armored Carrier Corporation, 256 Iowa 700, 128 N.W.2d 922 (1964), trial court’s adjudication is correct.
Affirmed, see rule 348.1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Versendaal v. Rose, 214 N.W.2d 914, 1974 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1358 (iowa 1974).
214 N.W.2d 914 (Versendaal v. Rose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hannan Ex Rel. Hannan v. Bowles Watch Band Co.
180 N.W.2d 221 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1970)
Hobbs v. Martin Marietta Company
131 N.W.2d 772 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1964)
Edgar v. Armored Carrier Corporation
128 N.W.2d 922 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1964)