Verschell v. Pike

65 A.D.2d 622, 409 N.Y.S.2d 533, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13320
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 30, 1978·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to set aside a conveyance, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 24, 1978, which granted a motion by plaintiff’s former attorney for a protective order. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion denied. The attorney-client privilege should be raised by a witness at the time of the examination before trial. Should the examiner improperly seek information regarding privileged matters, a witness may then exercise his right to claim privilege (Matter of Macku, 29 AD2d 539). It does not presently appear that any aspect of the prospective examination in the instant case relates to privileged communications. Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Gulotta and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Verschell v. Pike, 65 A.D.2d 622, 409 N.Y.S.2d 533, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13320 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

65 A.D.2d 622 (Verschell v. Pike) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carone v. Venator Group, Inc.
289 A.D.2d 185 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
In re Estate of Fiore
204 A.D.2d 637 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
305-7 West 128th Street Corp. v. Gold
178 A.D.2d 251 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)