Versatile v. Wright

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: August 26, 2009
• Docket: 09-6505
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6505

LORD VERSATILE, a/k/a Venson Coward,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

E.E. WRIGHT, JR., Chief Warden,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

RUFUS FLEMING, Eastern Regional Director; J.K. VAUGHAN, Inmate Hearing Officer; TRACY S. RAY, Chief Warden; RONALD T. COKER, Department of Corrections Liaison,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:05-cv-00768-RLW)

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 26, 2009

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lord Versatile, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Larry Fitzgerald, James R. Morgan, Jr., Robert T. Numbers, II, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, William Michael Holm, WILLIAMS MULLEN, McLean, Virginia, James Bennett Kinsel, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Tysons Corner, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Lord Versatile appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Versatile v. Wright, No. 3:05-cv-00768-RLW (E.D. Va.

Feb. 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED