Versaci v. Slezak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Versaci v. Slezak

93 A.D.2d 918, 475 N.Y.S.2d 352, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17806

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 8, 1983·Published

Opinion

— Motion to dismiss appeal granted, without costs. Since the order sought to be appealed is, essentially, a temporary restraining order contained in an order to show cause, it is not appealable (see Matter of State of New York v Fuller, 31 AD2d 71). Motion for permission to appeal, treated as motion, pursuant to CPLR 5704 (subd [a]), to vacate temporary restraining order contained in order to show cause dated March 7, 1983, granted, without costs. Such restraining order was improperly obtained since essentially the same relief had already been denied by a court of coordinate jurisdiction. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Motion to dismiss appeal granted, without costs. Since the order sought to be appealed is, essentially, a temporary restraining order contained in an order to show cause, it is not appealable (see Matter of State of New York v Fuller, 31 AD2d 71). Motion for permission to appeal, treated as motion, pursuant to CPLR 5704 (subd [a]), to vacate temporary restraining order contained in order to show cause dated March 7, 1983, granted, without costs. Such restraining order was improperly obtained since essentially the same relief had already been denied by a court of coordinate jurisdiction. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Levine, JJ., concur.

Versaci v. Slezak, 93 A.D.2d 918, 475 N.Y.S.2d 352, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17806 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

93 A.D.2d 918 (Versaci v. Slezak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related