Verrinder v. Wal-Mart Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Verrinder v. Wal-Mart Corp.

552 F. App'x 277

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 27, 2014·No. No. 13-2356·Published

Opinion

[278] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Verrinder appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his complaint for wrongful termination and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Verrinder v. Wal-Mart Corp., No. l:13-cv-00395-TDS-LPA (M.D.N.C. Aug. 2 & Nov. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[278] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Verrinder appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his complaint for wrongful termination and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Verrinder v. Wal-Mart Corp., No. l:13-cv-00395-TDS-LPA (M.D.N.C. Aug. 2 & Nov. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Verrinder v. Wal-Mart Corp., 552 F. App'x 277 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

552 F. App'x 277 (Verrinder v. Wal-Mart Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.