Verrinder v. Wal-Mart Corp.
This text of 552 F. App'x 277 (Verrinder v. Wal-Mart Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[278]*278Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
William Verrinder appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his complaint for wrongful termination and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Verrinder v. Wal-Mart Corp., No. l:13-cv-00395-TDS-LPA (M.D.N.C. Aug. 2 & Nov. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
552 F. App'x 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/verrinder-v-wal-mart-corp-ca4-2014.