Verrill v. Parker
This text of 65 Me. 578 (Verrill v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the case of Byard v. Parker, ante 576, argued with this case, we have decided that we can give no judgments against land and buildings ; but, in a case of this kind, only against the personal defendants.
It remains only to decide whether the defendants are personally liable or not, and for how much. We think both of them must be regarded as the contracting party, and liable to pay; the husband, because he admits i't; and the wife, because the labor was done upon her property, and for her benefit, and expended before * her eyes. The implication is not a strained one, that their promise should be considered as joint. The preponderance of evidence gives the plaintiff his whole bill. Defendants defaulted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
65 Me. 578, 1875 Me. LEXIS 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/verrill-v-parker-me-1875.