Verret v. Gaudin
This text of 28 La. Ann. 138 (Verret v. Gaudin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motion to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the transcript was filed after the legal delay had expired must prevail. The appeal was made returnable on the third Monday, being tho seventeenth day of January, 1876. The delay of three judicial days expired on the twentieth of January. On the twenty-first the appellee obtained from the deputy clerk of this court a certificate of the non-filing of the transcript in the clerk’s office. There is, however, an indorsement on the record that it was filed on the twenty-first, made by a different deputy. This Was too late, no extension having been obtained or asked for.
It is therefore ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 La. Ann. 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/verret-v-gaudin-la-1876.