Verret Construction Co. v. Jelco Inc.

572 P.2d 1029, 280 Or. 793, 1977 Ore. LEXIS 781
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided December 28, 1977·No. 36-355, SC 25120·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

*795 PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff brought an action to recover the reasonable value of the use of some heavy construction equipment. Defendant appealed from a judgment based upon a jury verdict for plaintiff. Defendant’s only assignment of error is that there was no substantial evidence to support the jury verdict.

Defendant made no motion for a non-suit or for a directed verdict. In the absence of having tested the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict in the trial court, defendant cannot raise the issue on appeal. Wood Ind'l Corp. v. Rose, 271 Or 103, 105-06, 530 P2d 1245 (1975); Shmit v. Day, 27 Or 110, 116-17, 39 P 870 (1895).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Verret Construction Co. v. Jelco Inc., 572 P.2d 1029, 280 Or. 793, 1977 Ore. LEXIS 781 (Or. 1977).

572 P.2d 1029 (Verret Construction Co. v. Jelco Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Falk v. Amsberry
626 P.2d 362 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1981)
Falk v. Amsberry
612 P.2d 328 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1980)
Baldwin v. Miller
606 P.2d 629 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1980)
Millard v. Smedes
601 P.2d 908 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1979)
Columbia Truck Sales, Inc. v. Humphrey
576 P.2d 373 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1978)
Hendrix v. McKee
575 P.2d 134 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1978)