Verplanck v. Kendall

15 Jones & S. 513
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedDecember 20, 1880
StatusPublished

This text of 15 Jones & S. 513 (Verplanck v. Kendall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Verplanck v. Kendall, 15 Jones & S. 513 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1880).

Opinions

Speir, J.,

writing for affirmance, said : “I am of the opinion that the putting the cause on the calendar and the giving or accepting a notice of trial, waives the stay under section 779 of the Code.....

“It is only costs of motion which are referred to in section 779. A motion is defined in section 768, 4 An application for an order is a motion, and when granted is a direction of the court or judge.’ An appeal taken to the general term, asking for a judgment of reversal [514]*514of the order made below, is not made by a motion for an order, but the appeal is made upon notice. . . .

“ Section 8,239 clearly makes a distinction between the disposition to be made of costs of a motion directed by an order to be paid, and the costs of an appeal from an order.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Jones & S. 513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/verplanck-v-kendall-nysuperctnyc-1880.