Veronica Aguilar v. Melvin Ocana
This text of Veronica Aguilar v. Melvin Ocana (Veronica Aguilar v. Melvin Ocana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed June 19, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D23-2279 Lower Tribunal No. 19-5102
Veronica Aguilar, Appellant,
vs.
Melvin Ocana, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Migna Sanchez-Llorens, Judge.
Thomas Neusom (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant.
Bravo Law and Gustavo A. Bravo (Weston), for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Veronica Aguilar appeals the trial court's final judgment distributing
funds resulting from the sale of real property. A trial court's judgment comes
to the appellate court cloaked with a presumption of correctness. It is the
duty of the appellant to provide a sufficient record, including a transcript of
proceedings necessary to establish reversible error. In the absence of a
sufficient record of the proceedings below, the appellate court is constrained
to affirm the judgment on appeal. See Joseph v. Henry, 367 So. 3d 1280
(Fla. 3d DCA 2023); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d
1150 (Fla. 1979).
Discerning no error on the face of the final judgment, we affirm.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Veronica Aguilar v. Melvin Ocana, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veronica-aguilar-v-melvin-ocana-fladistctapp-2024.