Vero Fruit Co. v. Owens

208 So. 2d 627, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5791
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 29, 1968
DocketNo. 67-233
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 208 So. 2d 627 (Vero Fruit Co. v. Owens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vero Fruit Co. v. Owens, 208 So. 2d 627, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5791 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case was tried before the Circuit Judge without a jury. At the completion of the trial the Judge entered a judgment awarding damages to the appellees, plaintiffs below.

It is well established that when a judge sits as both the trier of the facts and of the law, his findings of fact on appeal are considered in the same light under the law as if they were considered by a jury.

The judgment comes to us clothed with a presumption of correctness and the appellant in order to prevail must clearly demonstrate reversible error.

The record on appeal contains competent substantial evidence to support the judgment appealed and the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error.

Affirmed.

ALLEN, Acting C. J., and PIERCE and HOBSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dixson v. Kattel
311 So. 2d 827 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 So. 2d 627, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vero-fruit-co-v-owens-fladistctapp-1968.