Vero Beach Real Estate Investors, L.L.C. v. Jericho State Capital Corp. of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Vero Beach Real Estate Investors, L.L.C. v. Jericho State Capital Corp. of Florida

85 So. 3d 579, 2012 WL 1414309, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6481, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 961

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 25, 2012

Docket4D11-710

StatusPublished

This text of 85 So. 3d 579 (Vero Beach Real Estate Investors, L.L.C. v. Jericho State Capital Corp. of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vero Beach Real Estate Investors, L.L.C. v. Jericho State Capital Corp. of Florida, 85 So. 3d 579, 2012 WL 1414309, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6481, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 961 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Vero Beach Real Estate Investors, LLC (“VBRE”), a dissolved limited liability company, appeals an order which dismissed all the counts it brought in a Fourth Amended Complaint against Jericho State Capital Corporation of Florida (“Jericho”). We affirm the dismissal. The trial court correctly concluded that VBRE lacked standing because it assigned its claims against Jericho to the members of VBRE. We note that the counts asserted by the co-plaintiff, Eric Levine, a former member of VBRE, remain pending.

We understand VBRE’s concerns about the inconsistent positions taken by Jericho during this litigation. In seeking dismissal of Levine’s claims in earlier versions of the complaint, Jericho argued that Levine lacked standing because there was no valid assignment of VBRE’s claims against Jericho to Levine. We write this opinion to make it clear that our affirmance is based on the conclusion that VBRE assigned its claims against Jericho to the managing members of VBRE, including Levine. Therefore, it is now the law of the case that Levine received a valid assignment of VBRE’s claims against Jericho.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Vero Beach Real Estate Investors, LLC (“VBRE”), a dissolved limited liability company, appeals an order which dismissed all the counts it brought in a Fourth Amended Complaint against Jericho State Capital Corporation of Florida (“Jericho”). We affirm the dismissal. The trial court correctly concluded that VBRE lacked standing because it assigned its claims against Jericho to the members of VBRE. We note that the counts asserted by the co-plaintiff, Eric Levine, a former member of VBRE, remain pending.

We understand VBRE’s concerns about the inconsistent positions taken by Jericho during this litigation. In seeking dismissal of Levine’s claims in earlier versions of the complaint, Jericho argued that Levine lacked standing because there was no valid assignment of VBRE’s claims against Jericho to Levine. We write this opinion to make it clear that our affirmance is based on the conclusion that VBRE assigned its claims against Jericho to the managing members of VBRE, including Levine. Therefore, it is now the law of the case that Levine received a valid assignment of VBRE’s claims against Jericho.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 So. 3d 579, 2012 WL 1414309, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6481, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vero-beach-real-estate-investors-llc-v-jericho-state-capital-corp-of-fladistctapp-2012.