Vernor v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Vernor v. State

864 S.W.2d 416, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1694, 1993 WL 439413

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Vernor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 340 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 2, 1993·No. No. 63450·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Charles Vernor, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. The judgment of conviction sought to be vacated was for burglary in the second degree for which movant was sentenced to imprisonment for seven years as a class X offender.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Charles Vernor, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. The judgment of conviction sought to be vacated was for burglary in the second degree for which movant was sentenced to imprisonment for seven years as a class X offender.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Vernor v. State, 864 S.W.2d 416, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1694, 1993 WL 439413 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

864 S.W.2d 416 (Vernor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.