Vernon v. State

79 S.E. 85, 13 Ga. App. 274, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 120
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided August 25, 1913·No. 4836·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Russell, J.

1. Not merely the validity, but the very existence, of an assignment of error depends upon its approval and verification by the trial judge. The assignment of error with reference to the return of the jury into court and the additional instructions or recharge alleged to have been given, as qualified by the explanation of the trial judge, affords no ground for exception and no reason why the judgment rendered should be set aside.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict and there was no error in refusing a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vernon v. State, 79 S.E. 85, 13 Ga. App. 274, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 120 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

79 S.E. 85 (Vernon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cannon v. Gaines
34 S.E.2d 103 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)