Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Vernon v. State

Vernon v. State

558 So. 2d 535, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2125, 1990 WL 35929
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 29, 1990
DocketNo. 89-2931
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 558 So. 2d 535 (Vernon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vernon v. State, 558 So. 2d 535, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2125, 1990 WL 35929 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

At petitioner’s implied consent hearing held pursuant to Section 322.261, Florida Statutes (1987), the county court placed the burden of proof on petitioner, and ultimately sustained the suspension of petitioner’s driver’s license. The circuit court affirmed. After petitioner filed a petition for writ of certiorari, the respondent confessed error, stating that the burden of proof in a section 322.261 hearing should be on the state. We therefore grant the petition for writ of certiorari and remand this case for further consistent proceedings.

ERVIN, ZEHMER and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dept. of Hwy. Safety v. Farley
633 So. 2d 69 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
558 So. 2d 535, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2125, 1990 WL 35929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vernon-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.