Vernon Smith v. Willa Dean Spath etc

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 17, 1999
Docket99-1546
StatusUnpublished

This text of Vernon Smith v. Willa Dean Spath etc (Vernon Smith v. Willa Dean Spath etc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vernon Smith v. Willa Dean Spath etc, (8th Cir. 1999).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 99-1546 ___________

Vernon Smith, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Willa Dean Spath, Circuit Clerk, Lee * Eastern District of Arkansas County, Bill Lewellen, Public * Defender, Lee County, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * ___________

Submitted: March 31, 1999

Filed: May 17, 1999 ___________

Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Inmate Vernon Smith appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court1 for the Eastern District of Arkansas, dismissing with prejudice his 42 U.S.C.

1 The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable John F. Forster, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. § 1983 action prior to service. Smith claimed his Fourteenth Amendment due process rights were violated when defendants deliberately delayed the correction of a clerical error in his sentencing order. We conclude dismissal was proper because Smith’s complaint allegations show he suffered no resulting injury other than alleged emotional distress. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(e) (prisoners may not bring federal civil actions for mental or emotional injury without prior showing of physical injury); Knight v. Lombardi, 952 F.2d 177, 179 (8th Cir. 1991) (inmate’s procedural due process claim dismissed where inmate failed to allege or present evidence of injury flowing from alleged violation).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a). We deny Smith’s request for appointment of counsel.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Vernon Smith v. Willa Dean Spath etc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vernon-smith-v-willa-dean-spath-etc-ca8-1999.