Vernon Louisville, Jr. v. A. W. Gibbs
This text of 515 F. App'x 707 (Vernon Louisville, Jr. v. A. W. Gibbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Federal prisoner Vernon Alvin Louisville, Jr. appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the denial of a section 2241 habeas petition de novo and factual findings for clear error, see Reynolds v. Thomas, 603 F.3d 1144, 1148 (9th Cir.2010), and we affirm.
Louisville contends that he is entitled to credit toward his federal sentence for the time he served in state custody before he was released to federal authorities on September 14, 2007. This argument fails because the time Louisville spent in state custody was already credited toward his state sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b); Allen v. Crabtree, 153 F.3d 1030, 1033 (9th Cir.1998) (noting that section 3585(b) disallows double crediting for time served).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
515 F. App'x 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vernon-louisville-jr-v-a-w-gibbs-ca9-2013.