Vernon E. Zimmerman v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company

Third Circuit

Vernon E. Zimmerman v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company

331 F.2d 308, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5376

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 14, 1964·No. 14774_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record in this case and the briefs of the parties and have weighed the arguments of counsel. We have scrutinized the charge of the trial judge which the plaintiff-appellant contends was unfair or illegal in a number of respects. We find nothing that will support such allegations. We are convinced that no prejudicial error occurred in the proceedings below. Consequently, the judgment appealed from will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record in this case and the briefs of the parties and have weighed the arguments of counsel. We have scrutinized the charge of the trial judge which the plaintiff-appellant contends was unfair or illegal in a number of respects. We find nothing that will support such allegations. We are convinced that no prejudicial error occurred in the proceedings below. Consequently, the judgment appealed from will be affirmed.

Vernon E. Zimmerman v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company, 331 F.2d 308, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5376 (3d Cir. 1964).

Pincite

331 F.2d 308 (Vernon E. Zimmerman v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related