Vernon E. Zimmerman v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company

Third Circuit

Vernon E. Zimmerman v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company

331 F.2d 308, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5376

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMay 14, 1964

Docket14774_1

StatusPublished

This text of 331 F.2d 308 (Vernon E. Zimmerman v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vernon E. Zimmerman v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company, 331 F.2d 308, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5376 (3d Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record in this case and the briefs of the parties and have weighed the arguments of counsel. We have scrutinized the charge of the trial judge which the plaintiff-appellant contends was unfair or illegal in a number of respects. We find nothing that will support such allegations. We are convinced that no prejudicial error occurred in the proceedings below. Consequently, the judgment appealed from will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record in this case and the briefs of the parties and have weighed the arguments of counsel. We have scrutinized the charge of the trial judge which the plaintiff-appellant contends was unfair or illegal in a number of respects. We find nothing that will support such allegations. We are convinced that no prejudicial error occurred in the proceedings below. Consequently, the judgment appealed from will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

331 F.2d 308, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vernon-e-zimmerman-v-mississippi-valley-barge-line-company-ca3-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack