Vernie Reed, Jr. v. City of Tacoma

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 19 2017 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VERNIE WESTLEY REED, Jr., Nos. 14-35925, 14-35979

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:13-cv-05538-BHS Cross-Appellee

v. MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF TACOMA, a municipal corporation; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Cross-Appellants

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Benjamin H. Settle, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 10, 2017 Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, BEA, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

The evidence that Officer Terwilliger’s microphone was both attached to his uniform by a cord and stuck inside Vernie Reed’s vehicle as the vehicle started to move forward is not contested. Therefore, there is no genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Officer Terwilliger’s use of force was reasonable under the

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

circumstances, and the district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of Officer Terwilliger. Jackson v. City of Bremerton, 268 F.3d 646, 653 (9th Cir. 2001).

As there was no constitutional violation, the City of Tacoma cannot be held liable under Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York, 436 U.S. 658, 690–95 (1978). Therefore, the City of Tacoma was also entitled to summary judgment. Scott v. Henrich, 39 F.3d 912, 916 (9th Cir. 1994).

AFFIRMED.