Vernick v. Bennett
558 So. 2d 541, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2218, 1990 WL 37496
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 4, 1990·No. No. 89-0161·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Reversed upon authority of Queen v. Clearwater Electric, Inc., 555 So.2d 1262 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), and remanded for further proceedings.
We certify the following question to the Supreme Court of Florida as one of great public importance:
DO SECTIONS 95.11(5)(d) AND 631.68, FLORIDA STATUTES (1983), CONSTITUTE A BAR TO A SUIT ON A TORT CLAIM AGAINST AN INSURED ARISING OUT OF AN AUTOMOBILE ACCI[542]*542DENT AS TO ANY AMOUNT IN EXCESS OF THE APPLICABLE LIMITS OF AN INSURANCE POLICY ISSUED BY AN INSOLVENT INSURER WHEN SUIT AGAINST THE INSURED IS COMMENCED MORE THAN ONE YEAR AFTER THE DEADLINE FOR FILING CLAIMS, OR ANY EXTENSION THEREOF, WITH THE RECEIVER OF THE INSOLVENT INSURER?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vernick v. Bennett, 558 So. 2d 541, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2218, 1990 WL 37496 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
558 So. 2d 541 (Vernick v. Bennett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rubenstein v. Saldariagga
699 So. 2d 754 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)