Verner v. Verner

62 Miss. 260
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1884
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 62 Miss. 260 (Verner v. Verner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Verner v. Verner, 62 Miss. 260 (Mich. 1884).

Opinion

Campbell, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

It is settled in this State that a wife denied a support by her husband may bring her bill for alimony without seeking a divorce. Garland v. Garland, 50 Miss. 694, and Dewees v. Dewees, 55 Miss. 315. And as she is entitled to be maintained by her husband,, no reason is perceived why she shall not be allowed alimony pendente lite and the means to maintain her suit when her bill shows a case entitling her to permanent alimony, and she is without the means of present support and unable to conduct her suit, rendered necessary by the refusal of her husband to maintain her.

Whatever the origin and foundation of the practice of the courts to make such allowance to the wife, it is not affected by the Code of 1880, which was not designed to supersede or abridge the equitable rights of married women, except as it may expressly provide.

The practice in granting temporary alimony is settled by Porter v. Porter, 41 Miss. 116.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crosby v. Hatten
56 So. 2d 705 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1952)
Johnston v. Johnston
179 So. 853 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1938)
Crawford v. Crawford
130 So. 688 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1930)
Boyett v. Boyett
119 So. 299 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1928)
Rawlings v. Rawlings
83 So. 140 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1919)
Brahan v. Meridian Light & Ry. Co.
83 So. 467 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1919)
State ex rel. Young v. Superior Court
85 Wash. 72 (Washington Supreme Court, 1915)
Ross v. Ross
42 So. 382 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1906)
In re Popejoy
26 Colo. 32 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1899)
Milliron v. Milliron
68 N.W. 286 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1896)
Scott v. Scott
73 Miss. 575 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1895)
McFarland v. McFarland
64 Miss. 449 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 Miss. 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/verner-v-verner-miss-1884.