Verner v. McGhee

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Verner v. McGhee

26 S.C. 607

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Verner v. McGhee. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 S.C. 248 →

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided December 14, 1886·No. No. 1970·Published

Opinion

per Curiam,

This was a motion by appellants to suspend the appeal until a motion could be heard and decided on Circuit for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The court said: This motion is refused, it not appearing to the court that plaintiff, appellant, was ignorant of the alleged after discovered facts at the trial below, or if so that he had used due diligence to ascertain said facts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

per Curiam,

This was a motion by appellants to suspend the appeal until a motion could be heard and decided on Circuit for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The court said: This motion is refused, it not appearing to the court that plaintiff, appellant, was ignorant of the alleged after discovered facts at the trial below, or if so that he had used due diligence to ascertain said facts.

Verner v. McGhee, 26 S.C. 607 (S.C. 1886).

Pincite

26 S.C. 607 (Verner v. McGhee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.