Vermont v. New Hampshire

282 U.S. 796
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Vermont v. New Hampshire. Read the opinion of the Court — 289 U.S. 593
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 13, 1930·No. No. 3·Published

Opinion

The motion for the appointment of a Special Master in this case is granted; and Edmund F. Trabue, Esquire, of Louisville, State of Kentucky, is appointed special master in this cause. The master is directed to make special findings of fact and conclusions of law, and to submit the same to this Court with all convenient speed, together with his recommendations for a decree; he shall accord to the parties a full hearing on all questions in the cause, whether of fact or of law, and shall base his findings and recommendations on the entire record as heretofore made and this day ordered to.be filed in this Court: The findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the special master shall be subject to consideration, revision, or approval by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vermont v. New Hampshire, 282 U.S. 796 (1930).

282 U.S. 796 (Vermont v. New Hampshire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.