Verlyn G. Marth and Nina T. Marth v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Ninth Circuit

Verlyn G. Marth and Nina T. Marth v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

342 F.2d 417

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 5, 1965·No. 19547·Published

Opinion

342 F.2d 417

Verlyn G. MARTH and Nina T. Marth, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 19547.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

February 5, 1965.

Verlyn G. Marth, in pro. per.

Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., John B. Jones, Jr., Lee A. Jackson, Robert H. Solomon, Guy C. Tadlock, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before DUNIWAY and ELY, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The decision of the Tax Court is affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum, findings of fact and opinion of the Tax Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

342 F.2d 417

Verlyn G. MARTH and Nina T. Marth, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 19547.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

February 5, 1965.

Verlyn G. Marth, in pro. per.

Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., John B. Jones, Jr., Lee A. Jackson, Robert H. Solomon, Guy C. Tadlock, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before DUNIWAY and ELY, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The decision of the Tax Court is affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum, findings of fact and opinion of the Tax Court.

Verlyn G. Marth and Nina T. Marth v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 342 F.2d 417 (9th Cir. 1965).

Pincite

342 F.2d 417 (Verlyn G. Marth and Nina T. Marth v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.