Verle L. Penney v. Clarence T. Gladden
423 F.2d 1228, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9729
This text of 423 F.2d 1228 (Verle L. Penney v. Clarence T. Gladden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Verle L. Penney v. Clarence T. Gladden, 423 F.2d 1228, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9729 (9th Cir. 1970).
Opinion
The denial of habeas corpus relief by the district court is affirmed.
The refusal of the state trial judge to require disclosure of the name of an informer (a non-participating one) appears under the circumstances to have been within its sound discretion. Further, the point does not rise to constitutional proportions here.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
423 F.2d 1228, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/verle-l-penney-v-clarence-t-gladden-ca9-1970.